Young — Fifth District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Deandes L. Young v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
LAMBERT (Rick Scott, 2014); EISNAUGLE (Rick Scott, 2017)
Date Decided
August 11, 2026
Docket No.
5D2026-1182
Topics
Rule 3.800 Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance, Criminal Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Deandes L. Young, proceeding without counsel, appealed from the Circuit Court for Duval County in a matter identified as a Rule 3.800 appeal. The circuit court judge was Mark Borello.

The State was represented by Attorney General James Uthmeier and Assistant Attorney General Elizabeth Spiaggi. The appellate opinion does not describe Young’s arguments, the relief he requested, or the circuit court’s ruling.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed. Its disposition consists solely of the word “AFFIRMED” and provides no reasoning or discussion of the issues presented.

The decision was issued per curiam, with Judges Lambert, Eisnaugle, and MacIver concurring. The opinion states that it is not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s disposition.
  • The court did not explain the factual background, appellate arguments, or basis for affirmance.
  • The opinion identifies the proceeding only as a Rule 3.800 appeal.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Young’s appeal in the State’s favor but supplies no written analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases. Its significance is therefore limited to the affirmance in this particular proceeding.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top