Casalino-Burrows v. Casalino — Fifth District affirmed the nonfinal order without a written explanation

Case
Christine Casalino-Burrows v. Alyssa Casalino, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas S. Casalino, Jr.
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
JAY (Ron DeSantis, 2023); LAMBERT (Rick Scott, 2014)
Date Decided
August 11, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-2666
Topics
Nonfinal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance; Estates
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Christine Casalino-Burrows appealed a nonfinal order entered by the Circuit Court for Brevard County in litigation involving Alyssa Casalino, acting as personal representative of the Estate of Thomas S. Casalino, Jr.

The appellate court’s decision does not describe the underlying dispute, identify the order under review, state the parties’ arguments, or provide the trial court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s nonfinal order.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written opinion. Accordingly, the decision supplies no legal analysis or stated basis for the affirmance. Chief Judge Jay and Judges Lambert and Boatwright concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the nonfinal order under review.
  • The decision is a per curiam affirmance and contains no explanation of the court’s reasoning.
  • The opinion does not disclose the nature of the underlying dispute or establish an express rule of law.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the challenged nonfinal order in place. Because the court provided no written analysis, the decision offers no express guidance on the substantive or procedural issues presented by the appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top