Background
Myles Alpert appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for Collier County in litigation against Harry M. Zea and Alison Zea, individually and as trustees of the Rohar Trust dated July 12, 2011. Circuit Judge Tamara Lynne Nicola entered the decision under review.
The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.
The Court’s Holding
The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.
The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the merits. Chief Judge Traver and Judges Brownlee and Pratt concurred.
Key Takeaways
- The circuit court’s decision remains in effect.
- The appellate court affirmed without a written explanation of its reasoning.
- The opinion identifies no legal rule or fact-specific rationale supporting the result.
Why It Matters
The decision ends this stage of the appeal in the appellees’ favor, subject to any timely rehearing proceedings. Because the court issued an unexplained per curiam affirmance, the opinion offers no substantive guidance about the underlying dispute or the legal issues presented.