Thomas — First District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Norma Jean Thomas v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Rowe; Nordby; Long
Date Decided
August 28, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-1998
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Norma Jean Thomas appealed from a judgment or order of the Circuit Court for Bay County, where Judge Shonna Young Gay presided. The appellate opinion does not identify the underlying charges, the ruling challenged, or the arguments raised on appeal.

The appeal was considered by Judges Rowe, Nordby, and Long of the Florida First District Court of Appeal. Thomas was represented by the Public Defender’s Office, and the State was represented by the Attorney General’s Office.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam disposition. All three panel judges concurred.

The court provided no written reasoning or discussion of the facts, issues, or applicable law. The opinion therefore establishes only that the judgment or order under review was affirmed; it does not disclose the panel’s rationale.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the Bay County circuit court’s decision.
  • The ruling was unanimous and issued per curiam.
  • Because the court gave no explanation, the opinion does not identify the appellate issues or announce a legal rule.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s judgment or order in place. Its practical effect is limited to affirmance because the appellate court did not supply facts, legal analysis, or a stated basis for its ruling.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top