Nguyen v. Wade — Discretionary appeal denied without explanation

Case
Vananh Cao Nguyen v. Jasmin Arey Wade
Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Judge
Per Curiam
Date Decided
August 28, 2026
Docket No.
A27D0058
Topics
Discretionary Appeal, Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Vananh Cao Nguyen filed an application asking the Court of Appeals of Georgia to permit a discretionary appeal involving Jasmin Arey Wade. The matter arose from lower-court case number 24C05940.

The court’s brief order does not describe the underlying dispute, identify the ruling Nguyen sought to appeal, or state the grounds asserted in the application.

The Court’s Holding

The Court of Appeals denied Nguyen’s application for discretionary appeal.

The order provides no reasoning and does not address the merits of the parties’ underlying dispute. It identifies no judge or panel.

Key Takeaways

  • Nguyen’s application for discretionary appellate review was denied.
  • The court did not explain why it declined review.
  • The order states no holding on the merits of the underlying case.

Why It Matters

The denial means this discretionary appeal will not proceed in the Court of Appeals under docket number A27D0058. Because the order contains no analysis, it offers no substantive guidance beyond the disposition of this application.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top