Hinds v. Taeger — Florida appeals court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
John Hinds v. Linda Taeger
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Black; Atkinson; Smith
Date Decided
August 28, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-2917
Topics
Civil Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

John Hinds appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County in litigation against Linda Taeger. Circuit Judge Caroline Arkin entered the decision under review.

The appellate opinion does not describe the parties’ dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision. Judges Black, Atkinson, and Smith concurred in the per curiam disposition.

The court provided no written reasoning and announced no express rule of law. The opinion states only that the judgment was affirmed.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision remains in effect.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion does not identify the underlying claims or disclose the appellate issues.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this stage of the appeal in Taeger’s favor by leaving the circuit court’s ruling undisturbed. Because the court supplied no analysis, the opinion offers practitioners no substantive guidance on the legal questions presented.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top