Oxendine v. State — affirmed the circuit court’s ruling without explanation

Case
Carl Lee Oxendine, Jr. v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Jay, C.J.; Soud, J.; MacIver, J.
Date Decided
September 15, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-3366
Topics
Rule 3.850; Postconviction Appeal; Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Carl Lee Oxendine, Jr., proceeding pro se, appealed a ruling from the Circuit Court for St. Johns County in a proceeding under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Circuit Judge R. Lee Smith presided below.

The State of Florida appeared through the Attorney General’s Office. The appellate opinion does not describe Oxendine’s claims, the underlying criminal case, or the circuit court’s specific ruling.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.

The court issued a per curiam decision consisting only of the word “AFFIRMED.” It provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues raised on appeal.

Key Takeaways

  • The appeal arose from a Rule 3.850 proceeding in the St. Johns County Circuit Court.
  • The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The opinion states no facts, issues, reasoning, or legal rule supporting the result.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but supplies no written analysis for litigants or courts to apply in other cases. Its significance is therefore limited to the disposition of Oxendine’s appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top