Pyburn v. NCAA — Stay and supervisory writ denied in preliminary-injunction dispute

Case
Jack Pyburn, Jazmin Ferguson, Jamil Muttilib, Amiya Joyner, Rashad King, Michael Eley, Andrew Burnette, Wydett Williams, Keenan Landry, Thomas Marsala, Percy Daniels, Joshua “Greedy” Williams, Dae’Quan Wright, Derrian Ford, Asia Nicholson, Zxavian Harris, Chandler Jackson, Peitok Machar, TJ Harden, Blake Cotton, Ethan Johnson, Anthony Tarjae Hankerson, Jasmine Jones, Weylin Lapuaho, Emilee Boyer, Luke Drzewiecki, Trent Hendrick, Brylan Green, Avery Strickland Hurst, Sam Pissis, Junior Tuihalamaka, and DQ Smith v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit
Judge
Penzato; Lanier; Fields
Date Decided
September 14, 2026
Docket No.
2026 CW 1195
Topics
Preliminary Injunctions, Appellate Stays, Supervisory Writs
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

A group of individuals sued the National Collegiate Athletic Association in Louisiana’s 19th Judicial District Court for East Baton Rouge Parish. The appellate court’s brief writ disposition does not describe the underlying claims or the terms of the preliminary-injunction ruling at issue.

The Southeastern Conference and Commissioner Sankey sought supervisory review and a stay from the Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Their application challenged the district court’s refusal to suspend proceedings or an order or judgment relating to a preliminary injunction.

The Court’s Holding

The First Circuit denied both the requested stay and the supervisory writ. Citing Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article 3612(B) and (C), the court explained that an order or judgment concerning a preliminary injunction is not suspended during an appeal unless the court exercises its discretion to order otherwise.

The court further noted that a stay of additional proceedings is discretionary. It concluded that the Southeastern Conference and Commissioner Sankey had not shown that the district court abused its discretion.

Key Takeaways

  • An appeal involving a preliminary injunction does not automatically suspend the relevant order or judgment under Louisiana law.
  • Whether to stay further proceedings rests within the court’s discretion.
  • Supervisory relief was unavailable because the applicants failed to demonstrate an abuse of discretion by the district court.

Why It Matters

The disposition underscores the demanding standard for obtaining appellate intervention in Louisiana after a trial court declines to stay a preliminary-injunction matter. A party seeking supervisory relief must show more than disagreement with the trial court’s decision; it must establish an abuse of discretion.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top