Gulf Harbour Investments Corp. v. Dacal — Third District summarily affirmed the circuit court’s ruling

Case
Gulf Harbour Investments Corporation, et al. v. Victor A. Dacal
Court
Florida Third District Court of Appeal
Judge
LOGUE; GORDO; LOBREE
Date Decided
September 30, 2026
Docket No.
3D25-0953
Topics
Appellate Procedure; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Gulf Harbour Investments Corporation and other appellants appealed from a proceeding in the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County before Judge Migna Sanchez-Llorens. Victor A. Dacal was the appellee.

The Third District’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the claims or defenses, or the particular circuit-court ruling under review.

The Court’s Holding

In a per curiam decision, the Third District Court of Appeal affirmed.

The opinion provides no reasoning, legal analysis, or description of the basis for the affirmance. It also states that the decision is not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Key Takeaways

  • The Third District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The decision was issued per curiam by Judges Logue, Gordo, and Lobree.
  • The opinion does not disclose the facts, legal issues, or rationale supporting the affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place, but its summary nature provides no articulated rule or reasoning for attorneys to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top