Fininvest Overseas v. C.R. Aviation — Third District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Fininvest Overseas, Inc. v. C.R. Aviation, Inc.
Court
Florida Third District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lindsey; Lobree; Bokor
Date Decided
September 30, 2026
Docket No.
3D25-0140
Topics
Appellate Procedure; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Fininvest Overseas, Inc. appealed a ruling of the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County in litigation against C.R. Aviation, Inc. Circuit Judge Daryl E. Trawick entered the ruling under review in lower tribunal case number 22-1904-CA-01.

The Third District’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the trial court’s ruling, the arguments raised on appeal, or the applicable law.

The Court’s Holding

A three-judge panel consisting of Judges Lindsey, Lobree, and Bokor affirmed the circuit court’s ruling per curiam.

The court supplied no reasoning, legal analysis, or separate opinion. The decision states only “Affirmed” and notes that it is not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s ruling was affirmed.
  • The panel issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not identify the issues presented or establish an articulated rule of law.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the lower court’s ruling intact, but its lack of reasoning limits what attorneys can learn from it about the panel’s view of the facts or law. Practitioners should not infer a substantive holding beyond the affirmance itself.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top