McGruder v. State — Florida appellate court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Kevin Michael McGruder v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Northcutt; Silberman; Labrit
Date Decided
October 30, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-2362
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Kevin Michael McGruder, representing himself, appealed a ruling of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County. Circuit Judge Michelle D. Sisco presided below.

The State of Florida was represented on appeal by the Attorney General’s office. The appellate opinion does not identify the nature of the ruling under review or describe the underlying facts, arguments, or procedural history.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling. The decision was issued per curiam, with Judges Northcutt, Silberman, and Labrit concurring.

The court provided no reasoning or analysis. Accordingly, the opinion establishes only that the ruling under review was affirmed and does not disclose the legal grounds for that disposition.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the unidentified circuit-court ruling.
  • The court issued a per curiam decision without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not describe the underlying facts, issues presented, or basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves McGruder’s appeal in the State’s favor but supplies no reasoning for attorneys to apply in other cases. Any assessment of the issues litigated or the significance of the affirmance would require review of the appellate record and briefs.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top