Hayes, Sr. v. Kingsbarn Realty Capital — Hawaii appeals court dismissed appeal with prejudice under the pre-docketing rule

Case
Kevin J. Hayes, Sr. and Tomoko Matsumoto v. Kingsbarn Realty Capital, LLC
Court
Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawai‘i
Judge
Clyde J. Wadsworth, Presiding Judge; Sonja M.P. McCullen, Associate Judge; Daniel M. Gluck, Associate Judge
Date Decided
October 30, 2026
Docket No.
CAAP-26-0000620
Topics
Appellate procedure; Stipulated dismissal; Jurisdiction
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Kevin J. Hayes, Sr. and Tomoko Matsumoto were petitioners-appellees, and Kingsbarn Realty Capital, LLC was respondent-appellant in an appeal from the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, Case No. 1CSP-26-0000112.

On October 9, 2026, Kingsbarn filed a joint stipulation signed by counsel for all appearing parties. The parties agreed to dismiss the appeal with prejudice and to bear their own appellate attorneys’ fees and costs.

The Court’s Holding

The Intermediate Court of Appeals approved the stipulation and dismissed the appeal with prejudice. It ordered that each side bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs on appeal.

The parties had invoked Hawai‘i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 42(b), but the court concluded that the appeal had not yet been docketed. Rule 42(b) applies to docketed appeals, while Rule 42(a) authorizes dismissal before docketing. The court therefore dismissed the appeal under Rule 42(a).

Key Takeaways

  • A jointly stipulated appeal may be dismissed with prejudice before docketing under HRAP Rule 42(a).
  • HRAP Rule 42(b) governs dismissals of appeals that have already been docketed.
  • The parties’ agreement that each would bear its own appellate fees and costs was approved.

Why It Matters

The order distinguishes the procedural route for voluntary appellate dismissals based on whether the appeal has been docketed. Even where the parties cite the rule for docketed appeals, the court may apply the applicable pre-docketing provision when the record shows the appeal has not been docketed.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top