Jamie D. McCourt v. Federal Insurance Company — Court enters parties’ stipulated protective order governing confidential discovery material

Case
Jamie D. McCourt v. Federal Insurance Company
Court
U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Judge
Rozella A. Oliver
Date decided
2026-11-04
Docket No.
2:26-cv-07868
Topics
protective order, confidential discovery, stipulated order, magistrate judge, insurance litigation
Source
Mirrored from lexcalifornia.com

Disposition notice

On November 4, 2026, in Jamie D. McCourt v. Federal Insurance Company, No. 2:26-cv-07868-SB-RAO (C.D. Cal. Doc. 35), Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver signed the parties' stipulated protective order, reciting only 'FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED.' The entered order governs the designation, challenge, use, and sealing of 'CONFIDENTIAL' discovery material in the case, including a prohibition on disclosing protected material to generative-AI tools, and remains in effect after final disposition until a designating party agrees otherwise in writing or the court directs. The court provided no developed reasons of its own beyond the good-cause recital; the substantive terms are the parties' stipulation as adopted.

Read the public order

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top