Gipson v. State — appeal dismissed after unconditional guilty plea

Case
Rickey Gipson v. State of Arkansas
Court
Arkansas Court of Appeals, Division III
Judge
Wendy Scholtens Wood, Judge
Date Decided
September 2, 2026
Docket No.
CR-25-448
Topics
Guilty pleas; Appellate jurisdiction; Batson challenges
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Dallas County sheriff’s deputies stopped Rickey Gipson at a sobriety checkpoint in May 2024. According to the opinion, Gipson was intoxicated, possessed crack cocaine, and was driving with his four-year-old grandchild in the backseat. The State charged him with possession of less than two grams of cocaine, driving while intoxicated, and endangering the welfare of a minor.

After jury selection at his March 2025 trial, Gipson argued that the State had used five peremptory strikes to exclude Black prospective jurors in violation of Batson v. Kentucky. The circuit court denied the challenge. Before evidence began, however, Gipson entered guilty pleas to all charges and elected jury sentencing. He signed an unconditional guilty-plea statement acknowledging that he could not appeal the plea.

The Court’s Holding

The Arkansas Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal. Arkansas Rule of Appellate Procedure–Criminal 1(a) generally bars an appeal from a guilty plea, and Gipson’s plea was not conditional under Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 24.3(b).

The court held that none of the recognized exceptions to the no-appeal rule applied. Gipson did not challenge evidence or testimony from the separate sentencing hearing, did not appeal a posttrial motion attacking the legality or validity of his sentence, and challenged only his conviction through the pre-plea Batson ruling. His guilty plea therefore waived appellate review of that issue.

Key Takeaways

  • An unconditional guilty plea generally waives the right to appeal in Arkansas.
  • A defendant seeking appellate review after a guilty plea must satisfy a recognized exception, including a properly reserved written conditional plea.
  • A Batson challenge raised during jury selection cannot be appealed after an unconditional guilty plea when no exception applies.

Why It Matters

The decision reinforces that a defendant who pleads guilty after an adverse pretrial ruling ordinarily cannot seek appellate reversal of the conviction based on that ruling. Counsel seeking to preserve an issue for appeal must ensure that any conditional plea complies with Rule 24.3(b)’s written-reservation requirement.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top