Long v Northern Territory — Federal Court determines native title over pastoral and crown leases for eight Aboriginal landholding groups

Case
Long on behalf of the members of the Ahalper, Alekwarr, Alhalker/Atnangker, Ankweteng, Arnmanapwenty, Atwel, Ilkewartn and Rtwerrpe landholding groups v Northern Territory of Australia
Court
Federal Court of Australia
Date Decided
7 July 2026
Citation
[2026] FCA 853
Topics
Native Title, Aboriginal Land Rights, Consent Determination, Pastoral Leases
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

The Determination Area comprises approximately 4,267 square kilometres located about 160 kilometres north of Alice Springs, including the Woodgreen and Mt Skinner pastoral leases and two crown leases. The region is governed by Arandic laws and customs and is divided into eight estates associated with the Ahalper, Alekwarr, Alhalker/Atnangker, Ankweteng, Arnmanapwenty, Atwel, Ilkewartn and Rtwerrpe landholding groups. The landscape features mountain ranges, semi-permanent water sources, and significant cultural sites connected to Dreaming tracks and beings central to Aboriginal spiritual beliefs.

The claimant group has maintained continuous connection to the Determination Area from time immemorial, though this connection was disrupted and devastated following European settlement in the 1870s. Pastoral leases were introduced in the 1880s and 1910s, restricting Aboriginal access to water sources and leading to violent conflict. By the 1890s, disease, violence, and starvation had decimated the Aboriginal population. Despite these disruptions, senior members of the claim group have maintained living connections to the area through hunting, gathering, use of traditional water sources, and transmission of cultural knowledge to younger generations.

After fruitful negotiations between the applicants, the Northern Territory, and other respondents, the parties approached the court seeking orders under section 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) to make a determination of native title by consent. The applicants produced anthropological evidence demonstrating satisfaction of the requirements for native title under section 223 of the Act.

The Court’s Holding

Justice Burley determined native title exists in the Determination Area, with the court making orders recognizing both exclusive and non-exclusive native title rights. In NT Portion 2138 (the crown lease held by the Allalgara/Annangara Aboriginal Corporation), the court determined exclusive native title rights and interests under section 47A of the Act, conferring possession, occupation, use and enjoyment of the land to the exclusion of all others. In the remaining portions (704, 1802, 2673, 5091 and 5092), the court determined non-exclusive native title rights and interests.

The non-exclusive rights include access to and use of the land and waters for any purpose; taking and using resources; maintaining and protecting culturally significant places; living on the land; erecting structures; lighting fires (subject to limitations); and conducting cultural activities, ceremonies, meetings, burial rites, and teaching. The native title holders are Aboriginal persons who are members of the eight landholding groups by descent or through non-descent connections including spiritual identification, conception and birthplace affiliation, long-term residence, kinship ties, possession of traditional religious knowledge, and seniority in traditional matters.

The court appointed Altyerr Anwekantherrenh Aboriginal Corporation (Altyerr Anwekantherrenh means “all of our Dreamings together”) as the prescribed body corporate. The determination recognizes that native title does not extend to minerals, petroleum, or prescribed nuclear substances, and is subject to valid laws of the Northern Territory and Commonwealth. Other interests held by pastoral leaseholders, the railway corporation, and mining title holders prevail over the native title rights but do not extinguish them.

Key Takeaways

  • The Federal Court confirmed native title for eight Arandic landholding groups over approximately 4,267 square kilometres in the Northern Territory by consent determination under section 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).
  • The determination recognizes exclusive native title in one area (NT Portion 2138) and non-exclusive native title rights in five other portions, encompassing broad rights to access, use, occupy, and manage cultural and economic resources.
  • Native title holders’ identity is based on descent through family lines and non-descent connections including spiritual responsibility, birthplace affiliation, residence, kinship, traditional religious knowledge, and cultural seniority.
  • The determination preserves overlapping interests held by pastoral leaseholders, railway operators, and mining title holders, which prevail but do not extinguish the underlying native title.
  • Consent determinations under section 87 do not require contested litigation and reflect the Native Title Act’s emphasis on negotiated resolution.

Why It Matters

This determination is significant for recognizing and formalizing the native title rights of eight interconnected Arandic landholding groups over a substantial area in central Australia. By determining both exclusive and non-exclusive native title, the court restored legal recognition of Aboriginal connection to country that had been disrupted and suppressed for over 130 years. The determination establishes the legal framework for the landholding groups to exercise cultural and economic control over their estates, manage sacred sites and Dreaming tracks, and transmit traditional knowledge to future generations, while coexisting with pastoral and railway operations.

The consent determination process demonstrates practical resolution of native title claims through negotiation rather than contested litigation, consistent with the Native Title Act’s policy of conciliation. The appointment of Altyerr Anwekantherrenh Aboriginal Corporation as the prescribed body corporate provides a mechanism for collective management of native title and resources. The decision reaffirms that native title, though limited by modern land uses and resource extraction rights, remains a living legal reality capable of recognizing deep and continuing Aboriginal connection to country based on traditional laws and customs.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top