Patrick A. Cannavan v. Newsom, et al. — District court certifies appeal not in good faith and denies IFP status on appeal

Case
Patrick A. Cannavan v. Newsom, et al.
Court
U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
Judge
Kirk E. Sherriff (Joseph R. Biden, 2024)
Date decided
2026-11-03
Docket No.
1:26-cv-06045
Topics
in forma pauperis, appeal, good faith certification, duplicative litigation, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24
Source
Mirrored from lexcalifornia.com

Disposition notice

The court denied Cannavan's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Doc. 16), certified that the appeal is not taken in good faith because the underlying action was dismissed as duplicative of Cannavan v. Newsom, Case No. 1:26-cv-05670-FJS (PC), and directed the clerk to notify the Ninth Circuit of the certification pursuant to Rule 24(a)(3)(A).

Read the public order

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top