People v. Armstrong — Colorado appeals court upheld denial of postconviction relief without a hearing

Case
The People of the State of Colorado v. Perry Taylor Armstrong
Court
Colorado Court of Appeals
Judge
JUSTICE MARTINEZ; JUDGE J. JONES; JUDGE DUNN
Date Decided
August 20, 2026
Docket No.
24CA2001
Topics
Postconviction relief; Criminal procedure; Evidentiary hearings
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

A jury convicted Perry Taylor Armstrong of five felony counts of child abuse resulting in serious bodily injury, first degree assault, and nine misdemeanor child-abuse counts. The district court imposed an aggregate 192-year prison sentence, and the Colorado Court of Appeals previously affirmed the convictions and sentences.

Armstrong then timely sought postconviction relief under Crim. P. 35(c) and requested counsel. After appointing alternate defense counsel, the postconviction court received a supplemental motion with exhibits and the prosecution’s response with exhibits. It denied relief without a hearing after reviewing the motions, briefing, court file, and trial-related transcripts.

The Court’s Holding

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed. It held that, when deciding whether Crim. P. 35(c)(3)(V) requires a hearing, a postconviction court may consider materials in the case file and record that the parties attach to or reference in the postconviction motion or briefing.

Adopting the reasoning of People v. Martinez, the division rejected Armstrong’s proposed reading that would limit the court to the briefing itself. That reading would produce illogical results by preventing a court from checking record-based assertions and requiring hearings even where referenced record materials show the defendant cannot prevail. Armstrong challenged only the procedure, not the merits of the denied claims, so the division did not address those merits.

Key Takeaways

  • A Rule 35(c)(3)(V) hearing is not required when referenced or attached record materials support a written denial.
  • A defendant’s request for appointed postconviction counsel preserves a challenge to compliance with Rule 35(c)(3)(V).
  • The court did not decide the outer limits of what may constitute “the pleadings” under the rule.

Why It Matters

The decision confirms that Colorado postconviction courts need not disregard the existing record when briefing relies on it. Courts may deny relief without an evidentiary hearing when the referenced or attached record materials demonstrate that a hearing would be futile.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top