People v. Bement — Firearms restriction vacated; sentence and domestic-violence treatment upheld

Case
The People of the State of Colorado v. David Wilson Bement
Court
Colorado Court of Appeals
Judge
Judge Brown; Chief Judge Tow; Judge Harris
Date Decided
August 20, 2026
Docket No.
25CA0013
Topics
Domestic violence; Sentencing; Firearms restrictions; Petty offenses
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

David Wilson Bement was charged with several offenses arising from an altercation with his wife, including assault, menacing, weapon-related charges, child abuse, and criminal mischief. A jury acquitted him of every charge except criminal mischief for damaging his wife’s phone, a petty offense because the phone’s value was under $300.

The district court found that the factual basis of the criminal-mischief conviction included an act of domestic violence. It imposed the statutory maximum petty-offense penalties—ten days in jail, credited as served, and a $300 fine—while ordering a domestic violence evaluation and any recommended treatment. The court also announced firearms restrictions and denied Bement’s request to stay the sentence during appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Colorado Court of Appeals upheld the domestic-violence finding and treatment order. The record supported the finding because the phone damage occurred during an altercation in which Bement assaulted his wife and wrestled with her for the phone. The court also presumed that omitted trial transcripts would support the district court’s ruling.

The treatment requirement was authorized by statute and was not probation or additional punishment. The district court did not schedule compliance review hearings or order extra jail time for noncompliance; any future contempt proceeding was speculative and not ripe for review. Because domestic violence treatment is not punishment, the finding did not trigger Bement’s Sixth Amendment jury-trial rights or Eighth Amendment protections against excessive punishment.

But the court vacated the firearms restriction. The applicable statute covers qualifying misdemeanor domestic-violence convictions or crimes punishable by more than one year in prison. Bement’s conviction was a petty offense punishable by no more than ten days in jail, so that provision did not authorize the restriction.

Key Takeaways

  • A court may order domestic violence treatment after a petty-offense property conviction when the factual basis includes domestic violence.
  • Domestic violence treatment is not punishment, probation, or an increase to the statutory petty-offense sentence.
  • Colorado’s cited domestic-violence firearms restriction does not apply to a petty offense carrying a maximum ten-day jail term.

Why It Matters

The decision distinguishes mandatory domestic violence treatment from criminal punishment and supervision, allowing treatment orders even where the defendant has served the maximum jail term for a petty offense. It also limits firearms restrictions to the offenses covered by the statute’s express terms.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top