Kalima v. State — Delaware Supreme Court dismissed an interlocutory criminal appeal for lack of jurisdiction

Case
Aurora Kalima v. State of Delaware
Court
Supreme Court of the State of Delaware
Judge
Abigail M. LeGrow (John Carney, 2023)
Date Decided
October 1, 2026
Docket No.
339, 2026
Topics
Appellate Jurisdiction; Criminal Appeals; Final-Judgment Rule
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Aurora Kalima filed a notice of appeal from a Superior Court order denying her pretrial motions in a criminal case.

The Senior Court Clerk directed Kalima to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Kalima received an extension through September 24, 2026, but did not respond, so dismissal was deemed unopposed.

The Court’s Holding

The Delaware Supreme Court held that it lacked jurisdiction over the appeal. Under article IV, section 11(a)(2) of the Delaware Constitution, the court may review only a final judgment in a criminal case, and the order denying Kalima’s pretrial motions was interlocutory.

The court dismissed the appeal under Delaware Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b).

Key Takeaways

  • The Delaware Supreme Court lacks jurisdiction over interlocutory appeals in criminal cases.
  • An order denying pretrial motions is not a final criminal judgment reviewable by the court.
  • Kalima’s failure to answer the show-cause notice made dismissal unopposed.

Why It Matters

The order reinforces Delaware’s categorical final-judgment rule for criminal appeals: a defendant cannot immediately appeal a pretrial ruling to the Delaware Supreme Court.

Review in that court must await a final judgment in the criminal case.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top