District Courts Cases
Show: 1 day 1 week 1 month All
Custom (decided):
Coverage since February 11, 2025
✉️ New decisions, briefed in your inbox every morning — subscribe to Daily Case Law, free →

District Courts

U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Uncategorized

MAO Gaming v. Penn Entertainment — STREAK® Blackjack Trademark Claims Dismissed Again for Pleading Deficiencies

A Colorado federal court dismissed trademark and IP claims against Penn Entertainment and its Ameristar Casino subsidiary for the second time, finding that MAO Gaming’s complaint still failed to clearly distinguish which defendant was liable for the unauthorized use of the STREAK® blackjack br

U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
Uncategorized

In re Mosaic LLM Litigation (O’Nan v. Databricks) — Court Allows Authors’ Copyright Claims Over AI Training to Proceed Against Databricks

A federal judge in San Francisco denied Databricks’ motion to dismiss copyright infringement claims alleging the company used pirated books to train its MPT and DBRX large language models, finding the authors sufficiently tied their works to the AI models.

United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio
Uncategorized

Jane Doe v. Discord — N.D. Ohio Holds Section 230 Bars “Defective Design” Claims Over Sexual Predation

Judge Donald Nugent dismissed all claims — negligence, strict liability, concealment, and misrepresentation — against Discord brought on behalf of a minor sexually exploited by an adult user, holding that the plaintiff’s “defective design” theory was a repackaged demand that Discor

United States District Court, Western District of Arkansas (Fayetteville Division)
Uncategorized

NetChoice v. Griffin — W.D. Ark. Enjoins Arkansas Act 900 Social Media Restrictions on First Amendment Grounds

Judge Timothy Brooks granted NetChoice’s preliminary-injunction motion against Arkansas Act 900, the General Assembly’s second attempt to regulate minors’ use of social media after the same court enjoined the predecessor Act 689 in 2025. Act 900’s addictive-practices ban, man

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (Atlanta)
Uncategorized

Butzer v. HyperSphere Technologies — Developer-Founder’s Copyright Claims Over Quantum Encryption Software Dismissed for Failure to State a Claim

A Georgia federal court dismissed copyright infringement claims by the inventor of “key shadowing” quantum-resistant encryption technology against HyperSphere Technologies, the company to which he had assigned his patent, ruling he failed to adequately state a claim that his separately registered so

Uncategorized

Butzer v. HyperSphere Technologies — Developer-Founder’s Copyright Claims Over Quantum Encryption Software Dismissed for Failure to State a Claim

A Georgia federal court dismissed copyright infringement claims by the inventor of “key shadowing” quantum-resistant encryption technology against HyperSphere Technologies, the company to which he had assigned his patent, ruling he failed to adequately state a claim that his separately registered so

United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin
Uncategorized

MCP IP v. Ravin Crossbows — W.D. Wis. Grants Mixed Summary Judgment Across Ten Crossbow Patents, Send Two to Damages Trial

Judge Peterson carved up MCP IP’s ten-patent assault on the Ravin R500 crossbow: Ravin gets non-infringement summary judgment on six patents, MCP wins infringement and defeats invalidity on the ‘433 and ‘939 patents, and the court teed up show-cause briefing on three more.

U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California
Uncategorized

Vineyard Investigations v. Gallo — E.D. Cal. Orders Supplemental Briefing on Sensor-Per-650-Vines Scope and Section 101 Revisit

The E.D. Cal. ordered supplemental briefing on whether Gallo’s sparse “one soil moisture sensor per 650 vines” setup falls within Vineyard Investigations’ plant-level irrigation patents, and invited Gallo to renew its § 101 eligibility challenge in light of post-2021 Federal

U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Uncategorized

B.E. Technology v. Google — Delaware Court Invalidates Last Targeted Advertising Patent Claim Under §101

A Delaware federal judge granted Google summary judgment on the last remaining claim of B.E. Technology’s targeted advertising patent, finding Claim 25 of U.S. Patent No. 8,769,440 directed to the abstract idea of providing real-time targeted advertising and lacking any inventive concept under

United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas (Marshall Division)
Uncategorized

K.Mizra v. Nokia — E.D. Tex. Markman Order Rejects Nokia’s Narrow Construction of “Preemption” in Pseudowire Networking Patents

Judge Gilstrap largely sided with NPE K.Mizra in a claim construction ruling on three networking patents asserted against Nokia, rejecting Nokia’s attempts to narrow key terms like “preemption” and “Virtual Switch Instance.”

Scroll to Top