Show: 1 day 1 week 1 month All
Custom (decided):
Coverage since January 23, 2026
✉️ New decisions, briefed in your inbox every morning — subscribe to Daily Case Law, free →

Section 230

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Uncategorized

Eizenga v. MediaLab.Ai — S.D. Fla. Grants WorldStarHipHop Section 230 Immunity for Re-Captioned Defamatory Video

A federal district court dismissed defamation claims against WorldStarHipHop under Section 230, holding that downloading a third-party video and adding a new caption and tags constituted only ‘minor, paratextual modifications’ insufficient to strip platform immunity.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Uncategorized

Doe v. Meta Platforms — Ninth Circuit Holds Section 230 Bars Claims Over Facebook’s Role in Myanmar Genocide

The Ninth Circuit affirmed dismissal of claims by Rohingya plaintiffs alleging Facebook’s algorithm amplified anti-Rohingya violence in Myanmar, holding that Section 230 immunizes Meta from liability for algorithmically recommending third-party content — though two concurring opinions urged th

U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
Uncategorized

Tate v. Meta & Ligon v. Meta — Northern District of California Reinforces Section 230 Shield for Account Terminations

Two parallel N.D. Cal. rulings dismiss all claims—First Amendment, conspiracy, contract, and emotional distress—against Meta for suspending user accounts, holding that Section 230 immunizes platforms’ editorial decisions even when alleged to target political viewpoints.

Supreme Court of the State of Nevada
Uncategorized

Meta Platforms v. Eighth Judicial District Court — Nevada Supreme Court Denies Meta’s Writ Petitions, Holding Section 230 and the First Amendment Do Not Bar State AG’s Addictive-Design Claims

In a consolidated order resolving three writ petitions, the Nevada Supreme Court applied its earlier TikTok and Snap decisions to reject Meta’s challenge to the State’s deceptive-trade-practices, products liability, negligence, and unjust enrichment claims over Messenger, Facebook, and I

Uncategorized

Meta Platforms v. Eighth Judicial District Court — Nevada Supreme Court Denies Meta’s Writ Petitions, Holding Section 230 and the First Amendment Do Not Bar State AG’s Addictive-Design Claims

In a consolidated order resolving three writ petitions, the Nevada Supreme Court applied its earlier TikTok and Snap decisions to reject Meta’s challenge to the State’s deceptive-trade-practices, products liability, negligence, and unjust enrichment claims over Messenger, Facebook, and I

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Uncategorized

Taddeo-Waite v. X Corp. — Section 230 Shields Platform from Subscriber’s Claims Over Algorithmic Amplification and Content Moderation

A federal magistrate judge held that Section 230 immunizes X (formerly Twitter) from a premium subscriber’s claims that the platform amplified harmful content via its recommendation algorithm and suppressed the subscriber’s own posts, rejecting the argument that algorithmic curation falls outside Se

Uncategorized

Taddeo-Waite v. X Corp. — Section 230 Shields Platform from Subscriber’s Claims Over Algorithmic Amplification and Content Moderation

A federal magistrate judge held that Section 230 immunizes X (formerly Twitter) from a premium subscriber’s claims that the platform amplified harmful content via its recommendation algorithm and suppressed the subscriber’s own posts, rejecting the argument that algorithmic curation falls outside Se

United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio
Uncategorized

Jane Doe v. Discord — N.D. Ohio Holds Section 230 Bars “Defective Design” Claims Over Sexual Predation

Judge Donald Nugent dismissed all claims — negligence, strict liability, concealment, and misrepresentation — against Discord brought on behalf of a minor sexually exploited by an adult user, holding that the plaintiff’s “defective design” theory was a repackaged demand that Discor

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Uncategorized

Commonwealth v. Meta Platforms — Massachusetts Supreme Court Rules Section 230 Does Not Shield Instagram’s Addictive Design

In a landmark ruling, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court held that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act does not immunize Meta from state-law claims that Instagram was deliberately designed to addict children — distinguishing platform design choices from third-party content moderation

Scroll to Top