ABC IP LLC v. Peak Tactical LLC — Federal Circuit summarily affirmed the district court’s judgment

Case
ABC IP LLC and Rare Breed Triggers Inc. v. Peak Tactical LLC, doing business as Partisan Triggers, and Nicholas Norton
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Judge
Alan D. Lourie (George H. W. Bush, 1990); Richard Linn (Bill Clinton, 1999); Raymond T. Chen (Barack Obama, 2013)
Date Decided
September 15, 2026
Docket No.
26-1527
Topics
Summary Affirmance; Rule 36; Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

ABC IP LLC and Rare Breed Triggers Inc. appealed from a judgment of the U.S. District Court for the District of Wyoming in litigation against Peak Tactical LLC, doing business as Partisan Triggers, and Nicholas Norton. Chief Judge Kelly H. Rankin presided over the district-court case, docketed as No. 2:26-cv-00018-KHR.

The Federal Circuit heard and considered the appeal. Its nonprecedential disposition identifies the parties and counsel but provides no description of the underlying claims, the district court’s reasoning, or the issues presented on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment. The panel entered its decision per curiam under Federal Circuit Rule 36.

Because the court issued a Rule 36 judgment without an accompanying opinion, it supplied no reasoning and announced no express legal rule beyond affirming the judgment below.

Key Takeaways

  • The district court’s judgment remains in effect.
  • The Federal Circuit affirmed without a written opinion under Rule 36.
  • The disposition is expressly designated nonprecedential.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves this appeal in favor of Peak Tactical LLC and Nicholas Norton but offers no written analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases. Its practical significance lies in the affirmance of the district court’s judgment rather than in any newly articulated Federal Circuit doctrine.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top