Burgan v. Collins — Federal Circuit summarily affirmed the Veterans Court

Case
Lance Frederick Burgan v. Douglas A. Collins, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Judge
Dyk; Linn; Chen
Date Decided
September 10, 2026
Docket No.
25-1202
Topics
Veterans Benefits, Rule 36, Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Lance Frederick Burgan appealed from proceedings against the Secretary of Veterans Affairs in the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. The Veterans Court matter was docketed as No. 23-7869 and involved Judges Amanda L. Meredith, Coral Wong Pietsch, and William S. Greenberg.

The Federal Circuit’s nonprecedential disposition does not describe Burgan’s underlying claim, the Veterans Court’s reasoning, or the arguments presented on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Federal Circuit affirmed the Veterans Court’s decision under Federal Circuit Rule 36. The per curiam judgment contains no written opinion or explanation of the panel’s reasoning.

Because the court issued a Rule 36 affirmance, the disposition establishes only that the judgment below was affirmed. It does not articulate a new legal rule or expressly adopt any particular rationale.

Key Takeaways

  • The Federal Circuit affirmed the Veterans Court’s judgment.
  • The court used Rule 36 and provided no substantive analysis.
  • The disposition is designated nonprecedential.

Why It Matters

The judgment ends Burgan’s Federal Circuit appeal without disturbing the Veterans Court’s result. Its value as guidance for other veterans-benefits cases is limited because it is nonprecedential and contains no explanation of the governing facts or law.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top