In re: Niaspan Antitrust Litigation — Court partly grants motion to exclude John R. Thomas’s proposed testimony

Case
IN RE: NIASPAN ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Court
United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Date Decided
2026-10-30
Docket No.
2:13-md-02460
Judge(s)
Timothy J. Savage
Topics
expert testimony, motion to exclude, patent law, antitrust law, Hatch-Waxman Act, pharmaceutical litigation
Source
Mirrored from lexsummary.com

Disposition Notice

On October 30, 2026, Judge Timothy J. Savage of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granted in part and denied in part the defendants' motion to exclude the opinions and proposed testimony of John R. Thomas (Doc. No. 791) in In re: Niaspan Antitrust Litigation, No. 13-MD-2460. The order followed consideration of the motion, the plaintiffs' response, the defendants' reply, and oral argument. Thomas may not testify or opine on the application of antitrust law and/or patent law to the facts of the case, including that the defendants violated either body of law. He also may not testify or opine that competitors in the pharmaceutical industry who "choose to bypass or subvert the legislative framework" potentially engage in strategic behavior defying the Hatch-Waxman Act's policy goals. The one-page order does not identify which portions of the motion were denied or provide further reasoning.

Full Opinion

Your browser cannot display this PDF inline.

Download the full opinion (PDF)

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top