Students Engaged in Advancing Texas v. Paxton — Fifth Circuit granted rehearing en banc and vacated the panel opinion

Case
Computer & Communications Industry Association; NetChoice, L.L.C. v. Ken Paxton, consolidated with Students Engaged in Advancing Texas; M.F., by and through next friend, Vanessa Fernandez; Ampersand Group, L.L.C.; Brandon Closson v. Ken Paxton
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Judge
Jennifer Walker Elrod (George W. Bush, 2007); Edith H. Jones (Ronald Reagan, 1985); Jerry E. Smith (Ronald Reagan, 1987); Carl E. Stewart (Bill Clinton, 1994); Priscilla Richman (George W. Bush, 2005); Leslie H. Southwick (George W. Bush, 2007); Catharina Haynes (George W. Bush, 2008); James E. Graves Jr. (Barack Obama, 2011); Stephen A. Higginson (Barack Obama, 2011); Don R. Willett (Donald J. Trump, 2017); James C. Ho (Donald Trump, 2017); Stuart Kyle Duncan (Donald Trump, 2018); Kurt D. Engelhardt (Donald Trump, 2018); Andrew S. Oldham (Donald Trump, 2018); Cory T. Wilson (Donald Trump, 2020); Dana M. Douglas (Joseph R. Biden Jr., 2022); Irma Carrillo Ramirez (Joe Biden, 2023)
Date Decided
October 28, 2026
Docket No.
24-50721 consolidated with 25-50096
Topics
En Banc Rehearing, Vacatur, Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Two consolidated appeals arose from proceedings in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. One was brought by the Computer & Communications Industry Association and NetChoice, L.L.C.; the other was brought by Students Engaged in Advancing Texas, M.F. through a next friend, Ampersand Group, L.L.C., and Brandon Closson. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton was the defendant-appellant in both appeals.

A Fifth Circuit panel issued an opinion in the consolidated cases on July 24, 2026. A petition for rehearing en banc followed, and a member of the court requested a poll of the active judges eligible to participate.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth Circuit ordered the consolidated cases reheard en banc after a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service who were not disqualified voted in favor of rehearing. The court stated that it would hear oral argument on a date to be set later and that the clerk would establish a supplemental-briefing schedule.

Under Fifth Circuit Rule 41.3, the court vacated the panel opinion dated July 24, 2026. The order did not resolve the merits of the parties’ dispute.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth Circuit granted rehearing en banc in the consolidated appeals.
  • The July 24, 2026 panel opinion was vacated and no longer represents the court’s operative decision.
  • The full court will receive supplemental briefing and hear oral argument before reconsidering the cases.

Why It Matters

The en banc grant removes the panel opinion from effect and places the consolidated appeals before the full Fifth Circuit. Any conclusions reached by the panel must now await reconsideration through supplemental briefing and oral argument.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top