Turner v. King — Fourth Circuit upheld dismissal and summary judgment in Section 1983 suit

Case
Bryan Anthony Turner v. Jordan B. King
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Judge
King; Heytens; Benjamin
Date Decided
September 1, 2026
Docket No.
26-6379
Topics
Section 1983; False Arrest; False Imprisonment; Malicious Prosecution
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Bryan Anthony Turner brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Wilson Police Department Detective Jordan B. King and the City of Wilson. The district court entered several orders dismissing various claims and defendants and denying Turner’s motion to amend.

The district court ultimately granted summary judgment to King on Turner’s claims for false arrest, false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution. Turner, proceeding pro se, appealed those rulings to the Fourth Circuit.

The Court’s Holding

In an unpublished per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court’s orders. After reviewing the record, the appellate court concluded that it found no reversible error.

The court did not provide additional analysis of the underlying claims or the motion to amend. It also dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the submitted materials and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of various claims and defendants in Turner’s Section 1983 action.
  • The court also upheld the denial of Turner’s motion to amend and the grant of summary judgment to Detective King.
  • The unpublished opinion identified no reversible error but did not independently analyze the merits of Turner’s false-arrest, false-imprisonment, or malicious-prosecution theories.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves intact the district court’s disposition of Turner’s civil-rights claims, including summary judgment for King. Because the Fourth Circuit designated the opinion as unpublished, it is not binding precedent in that circuit.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top