United States v. Stokes — Eighth Circuit upheld firearm enhancement tied to drug possession

Case
United States of America v. Daijon Jarell Stokes
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Judge
Gruender; Kelly; Kobes
Date Decided
October 28, 2026
Docket No.
25-2514
Topics
Criminal Sentencing, Firearms, Drug Possession
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Daijon Jarell Stokes pleaded guilty to possessing a firearm as a felon. During a 2023 traffic stop, Stokes fled by car and then on foot before officers arrested him. Officers found cocaine and a synthetic cannabinoid in his pocket, as well as a loaded pistol on his car’s dashboard and marijuana, THC vape cartridges, and synthetic cannabinoid in the glove box and center console.

The presentence investigation report recommended a four-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) for possessing a firearm in connection with another felony offense. Because Stokes had five prior marijuana convictions, his latest marijuana-possession offense qualified as a felony under Iowa law. The district court applied the enhancement, finding that the loaded pistol’s accessibility and proximity to a non-residual quantity of drugs gave it the potential to facilitate Stokes’s drug possession.

The Court’s Holding

The Eighth Circuit affirmed, holding that the district court did not clearly err in finding that Stokes possessed the pistol in connection with his drug offense. The applicable guideline commentary provides that a firearm is possessed “in connection with” another felony when it facilitated or had the potential to facilitate that offense.

The court emphasized that Stokes carried a loaded pistol within immediate reach while transporting a non-residual amount of drugs on a public road. Those circumstances permitted the district court to find that the weapon and drugs were purposefully together and that the pistol could have protected Stokes or the drugs. Stokes’s argument that he previously possessed drugs without a firearm did not make the district court’s permissible view of the evidence clearly erroneous.

Key Takeaways

  • A firearm need not actually be used to support the enhancement; its potential to facilitate another felony offense is sufficient.
  • Concurrent public possession of an accessible firearm and a non-residual quantity of drugs can support an inference that the weapon facilitated or could facilitate drug possession.
  • The Eighth Circuit applied clear-error review to the district court’s factual finding connecting the firearm to the drug offense.

Why It Matters

The unpublished decision reinforces the Eighth Circuit’s deferential approach to findings that an accessible firearm potentially facilitated drug possession. When drugs and a loaded weapon are kept close together in a vehicle, sentencing courts may infer a purposeful connection even without evidence that the defendant displayed or fired the weapon.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top