Weatherford v. Halliburton — dismissed the appeal and cross-appeal by agreement

Case
Weatherford U.S., L.P. v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Judge
Not specified
Date Decided
July 20, 2026
Docket No.
2026-1270, 26-1438
Topics
Patent Appeals; Voluntary Dismissal; Inter Partes Review
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Weatherford U.S., L.P. appealed from a proceeding before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, identified as IPR2024-00990. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. filed a cross-appeal.

The parties subsequently agreed to dismiss the Federal Circuit proceeding. The court issued a nonprecedential order addressing that agreement.

The Court’s Holding

The Federal Circuit dismissed the proceeding under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b) based on the parties’ agreement.

The court ordered each side to bear its own costs. It did not address the merits of the underlying inter partes review or establish any rule of patent law. The order issued as the mandate on July 20, 2026.

Key Takeaways

  • The appeal and cross-appeal were dismissed by agreement of the parties.
  • Each side must bear its own costs.
  • The nonprecedential order contains no ruling on the merits of the PTAB proceeding.

Why It Matters

The order ends the Federal Circuit litigation without appellate review of the PTAB matter. Because the court reached no merits issue, the order provides no substantive guidance for future patent disputes.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top