Background
Yieldmo, Inc. appealed from a judgment of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in its case against Teads, Inc., Teads SA, and Teads SARL. District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer had presided over the underlying action, docketed as No. 1:25-cv-00737-PAE.
The Federal Circuit’s disposition does not describe the parties’ claims, the district court’s reasoning, or the arguments presented on appeal. It identifies counsel for both sides and states that the appeal was heard and considered.
The Court’s Holding
The Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment. Chief Judge Moore and Circuit Judges Stoll and Cunningham issued the judgment per curiam.
The court relied on Federal Circuit Rule 36 and provided no written opinion explaining its reasoning. The nonprecedential disposition therefore establishes only that the judgment below was affirmed; it does not articulate a legal rule or independently endorse any particular rationale.
Key Takeaways
- The Federal Circuit affirmed the Southern District of New York’s judgment in favor of the Teads defendants.
- The court used Rule 36, resolving the appeal without a written opinion.
- The disposition is designated nonprecedential and supplies no factual or legal analysis.
Why It Matters
The judgment ends this appeal with the district court’s result intact. Because the Federal Circuit gave no reasons, the disposition offers no precedential guidance on the underlying issues and should not be read as adopting any specific aspect of the district court’s analysis.