Yongqiang v. Fox Factory — Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal by agreement of the parties

Case
Dong Yongqiang v. Fox Factory, Inc.
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Judge
Not specified
Date Decided
July 23, 2026
Docket No.
2026-1332
Topics
Trademark; Voluntary Dismissal; Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Dong Yongqiang appealed from a proceeding before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, identified as TTAB No. 92081730. Fox Factory, Inc. was the appellee.

During the Federal Circuit appeal, the parties agreed that the proceeding should be dismissed. The court’s brief, nonprecedential order does not describe the underlying trademark dispute or the reasons for the parties’ agreement.

The Court’s Holding

The Federal Circuit dismissed the proceeding under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b), which governs voluntary dismissals. The dismissal was based on the parties’ agreement rather than a decision on the merits.

The court ordered each side to bear its own costs. The order was issued as the mandate on July 23, 2026, the same day it was entered.

Key Takeaways

  • The appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board was dismissed by agreement of the parties.
  • The Federal Circuit did not decide the merits of the underlying trademark dispute.
  • Each party must bear its own costs, and the nonprecedential order took immediate effect as the mandate.

Why It Matters

The order ends the Federal Circuit proceeding without an appellate ruling on the TTAB matter. Because the dismissal was voluntary and the order is nonprecedential, it establishes no substantive rule of trademark law or appellate procedure.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top