3233 Maricamp — Fifth District affirmed the nonfinal order without a written explanation

Case
3233 Maricamp, LLC, and James Maxwell v. Joe Javadzadeh and Maxwell Investments #2, LLC
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Edwards; Eisnaugle; Boatwright
Date Decided
October 6, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-3307
Topics
Nonfinal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

3233 Maricamp, LLC, and James Maxwell appealed a nonfinal order entered by the Circuit Court for Marion County in litigation against Joe Javadzadeh and Maxwell Investments #2, LLC.

The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, identify the challenged ruling, or state the appellants’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s nonfinal order.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning or announcing a rule of law. Judges Edwards, Eisnaugle, and Boatwright concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s nonfinal order remains in effect.
  • The decision provides no factual or legal analysis explaining the affirmance.
  • The opinion was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves this nonfinal appeal in the appellees’ favor, but its unexplained per curiam disposition offers no articulated reasoning for attorneys to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top