Addison v. State — Fifth DCA affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in a Rule 3.850 appeal

Case
James Edward Addison, Jr. v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Per Curiam
Date Decided
October 6, 2026
Docket No.
5D2026-0297
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Rule 3.850; Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

James Edward Addison, Jr., proceeding without counsel, appealed from the Circuit Court for Volusia County in a proceeding identified as a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 appeal. Circuit Judge Karen Adams Foxman entered the ruling under review.

The State of Florida made no appearance in the appellate proceeding. The Fifth District’s brief opinion does not describe Addison’s claims, the circuit court’s ruling, or the grounds for the appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.

The court issued a per curiam decision without explaining its reasoning. Judges Edwards, Kilbane, and MacIver concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the ruling under review in Addison’s Rule 3.850 appeal.
  • The opinion does not identify the claims presented or specify the nature of the circuit court’s ruling.
  • Because the court provided no reasoning, the opinion offers no stated analysis beyond the affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but supplies no explanation that could guide litigants on the substantive or procedural issues involved.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top