Air Park Condominium Association v. Crile — Fifth District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Air Park Condominium Association, Inc. v. Vaughn W. Crile, Gayle M. Crile, Brian S. Crile, Red Carpet Helicopters, Inc., and Air Park Condominium Two Owner’s Association, Inc.
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Eisnaugle; Harris; Kilbane
Date Decided
September 15, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-0628
Topics
Condominium Law; Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Air Park Condominium Association, Inc. appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for Volusia County in litigation involving Vaughn W. Crile, Gayle M. Crile, Brian S. Crile, Red Carpet Helicopters, Inc., and Air Park Condominium Two Owner’s Association, Inc.

The appeal arose from lower-tribunal case number 2020-010682-CIDL, before Circuit Judge Randell H. Rowe III. The appellate court’s brief disposition does not describe the underlying dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, or the arguments raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision. The ruling was issued per curiam, with Judges Eisnaugle, Harris, and Kilbane concurring.

Because the court provided no written reasoning beyond “AFFIRMED,” the opinion establishes only that the judgment under review remains in place. It does not identify the grounds for affirmance or announce a legal rule.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s decision in full.
  • The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The disposition leaves the lower court’s judgment intact but provides no articulated rule for future cases.

Why It Matters

The immediate effect is that the circuit court’s judgment remains operative between the parties, subject to any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Because the court supplied no factual discussion or legal analysis, attorneys should not read the decision as resolving any particular substantive condominium-law issue beyond the result in this appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top