Alexandre v. Progressive Express Insurance Co. — affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Jennifa Alexandre v. Progressive Express Insurance Company
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Levine; Klingensmith; Caryn Siperstein, Associate Judge
Date Decided
September 17, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-3711
Topics
Insurance; Civil Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jennifa Alexandre, proceeding without counsel, appealed an order or judgment from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County. Circuit Judge John B. Bowman presided over the lower-court case, docketed as No. 062025CA006512AXXXCE.

Progressive Express Insurance Company appeared as the appellee. The Fourth District’s opinion does not describe the dispute, the trial court’s ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no reasoning or legal analysis. Accordingly, the opinion establishes only that the challenged ruling was left intact; it does not disclose the grounds for affirmance.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District affirmed the circuit court’s decision.
  • The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

The decision ends the appeal in Progressive’s favor unless altered through rehearing or further review. Because the court supplied no reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance on the underlying insurance dispute or the legal principles involved.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top