Amelio v. Omlor — affirmed the circuit court’s judgment without explanation

Case
Alfonso Amelio v. Jeanne Omlor
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Northcutt; LaRose; Rothstein-Youakim
Date Decided
October 7, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-1340
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Alfonso Amelio appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, where Judge Elizabeth Jack presided. Jeanne Omlor was the appellee.

Both parties appeared pro se. The appellate opinion provides no facts, procedural history, legal arguments, or description of the circuit court’s ruling.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court supplied no reasoning or legal analysis. Judges Northcutt, LaRose, and Rothstein-Youakim concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision was affirmed.
  • The appellate court did not explain the basis for its ruling.
  • The opinion identifies no facts, issues, or governing legal principles.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s decision in place. Because the opinion contains only an unexplained affirmance, it does not reveal how the court evaluated the parties’ dispute or provide substantive guidance for other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top