Andrews v. Florida Department of Corrections — First District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Sylvester Andrews v. Fla. Dept. of Corrections, State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Bilbrey; M.K. THOMAS (Rick Scott, 2016); Long
Date Decided
October 2, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-2158
Topics
Appellate Procedure; Per Curiam Affirmance; Corrections
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Sylvester Andrews, proceeding pro se, appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Hamilton County. Circuit Judge Melissa G. Olin entered the decision under review, and the Florida Department of Corrections and the State of Florida appeared as appellees.

The First District’s opinion does not describe Andrews’s claims, the underlying facts, or the circuit court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning. Judges Bilbrey, M.K. Thomas, and Long concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision remains in effect.
  • The appellate court provided no written analysis of the facts or legal issues.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Andrews’s appeal in favor of the Department of Corrections and the State, but its summary form offers no substantive guidance about the legal issues presented.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top