Arevalo-Rodriguez — First District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Mario Arevalo-Rodriguez v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
KELSEY (Rick Scott, 2015); LONG (Ron DeSantis, 2020)
Date Decided
July 21, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-2583
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance, Pro Se Litigation
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Mario Arevalo-Rodriguez, proceeding pro se, appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Leon County. Circuit Judge James Lee Marsh presided below, and the State of Florida was the appellee.

The First District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying charges, the challenged ruling, the arguments raised on appeal, or the procedural history beyond identifying the lower court.

The Court’s Holding

The First District affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no reasoning, legal analysis, or discussion of the issues presented. Judges Kelsey, Long, and Treadwell concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not identify the substantive or procedural grounds for the appeal.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s decision in place, but its lack of reasoning limits what attorneys can draw from it about the governing law or the court’s treatment of any particular appellate issue.

The decision was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top