Baity v. State — First District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Jimmy Baity v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Roberts; Rowe; Kelsey
Date Decided
October 6, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-3203
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jimmy Baity, proceeding pro se, appealed from the Circuit Court for Leon County, where Judge J. Lee Marsh presided.

The First District’s opinion does not describe the underlying charges, the challenged ruling, the arguments on appeal, or the circuit court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no written analysis or explanation for the affirmance. Judges Roberts, Rowe, and Kelsey concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion supplies no facts or legal analysis from which a broader holding can be drawn.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but offers no precedential reasoning or guidance on the merits of Baity’s appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top