Balch v. Rocket Mortgage — Fourth DCA affirmed a nonfinal order without a written opinion

Case
Sherman Balch v. Rocket Mortgage, LLC f/k/a Quicken Loans, LLC
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Levine; Conner; Klingensmith
Date Decided
September 3, 2026
Docket No.
4D2026-0537
Topics
Appellate Procedure; Nonfinal Orders; Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Sherman Balch appealed a nonfinal order entered by the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County. Circuit Judge Danielle A. Sherriff entered the order in lower-court case number 502025CA001779XXXAMB.

Balch represented himself on appeal. The opinion states that no appearance was required for Rocket Mortgage, LLC, formerly known as Quicken Loans, LLC. Because the appellate court issued no factual discussion, the opinion does not identify the nature of the underlying claims, the substance of the nonfinal order, or Balch’s arguments for reversal.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s nonfinal order. The decision was issued per curiam, with Judges Levine, Conner, and Klingensmith concurring.

The court provided no analysis or explanation for its ruling. Accordingly, the opinion establishes only that the challenged nonfinal order remained in effect; it does not announce a legal rule or disclose the grounds on which the panel rejected the appeal.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth DCA affirmed the Palm Beach County circuit court’s nonfinal order.
  • The court issued a one-word merits disposition and provided no factual or legal analysis.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the challenged nonfinal order undisturbed and allows the trial-court proceedings to continue subject to that order. Its significance beyond the parties is limited because the court did not explain its reasoning or articulate a broader rule of law.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top