Balulad v. Tower Hill — Fifth District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Sujata Balulad v. Tower Hill Prime Insurance Company
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Makar; Harris; Kilbane
Date Decided
October 8, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-1394
Topics
Insurance; Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Sujata Balulad appealed a ruling of the Circuit Court for Sumter County in litigation against Tower Hill Prime Insurance Company. Circuit Judge Erin Corcoran Daly presided over the lower-court case.

The appellate opinion does not describe the insurance dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision. Judges Makar, Harris, and Kilbane concurred in the per curiam disposition.

The court provided no analysis or explanation for its decision. The opinion therefore establishes only that the judgment under review was affirmed, without identifying the legal grounds supporting that result.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The decision was issued per curiam, with Judges Makar, Harris, and Kilbane concurring.
  • Because the opinion contains no facts or legal reasoning, it does not disclose the appellate issues or the basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the lower court’s ruling in place but offers no written guidance on the underlying insurance issues. Attorneys should not infer factual findings or legal holdings beyond the affirmance itself.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top