Barrett — Second District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Brett Barrett v. TP3 Building Solutions, LLC; Dorman T. Payne; and Valley National Bank
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Silberman; Sleet; Smith
Date Decided
October 21, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-2948
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Brett Barrett appealed from a decision of the County Court for Pinellas County, where Judge Edwin B. Jagger presided. The appellees were TP3 Building Solutions, LLC, Dorman T. Payne, and Valley National Bank.

The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the county court’s ruling, or Barrett’s arguments on appeal. Valley National Bank did not appear in the appellate proceeding.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s decision. The court issued a per curiam disposition consisting only of the word “Affirmed.”

Because the court provided no written reasoning, the opinion establishes no express rule of law and does not identify the grounds supporting affirmance. Judges Silberman, Sleet, and Smith concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District left the county court’s decision in place.
  • The court provided no explanation of the facts, issues, or legal basis for its ruling.
  • The disposition was unanimous, with Judges Silberman, Sleet, and Smith concurring.

Why It Matters

The ruling resolves Barrett’s appeal in favor of the appellees but offers no written guidance for litigants or lower courts. Its practical significance is therefore limited primarily to the parties and the judgment under review.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top