Battle-Donson v. State — First District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Delanie J. Battle-Donson v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Ray; M.K. THOMAS (Rick Scott, 2016); Long
Date Decided
October 19, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-2849
Topics
Appellate Procedure, Per Curiam Affirmance, Pro Se Litigation
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Delanie J. Battle-Donson appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Escambia County, where Judge John L. Miller, Jr. presided. The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the ruling challenged on appeal, or the arguments presented.

Battle-Donson represented herself on appeal. The State of Florida was represented by Attorney General James Uthmeier and Assistant Attorney General Christina Piotrowski.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion. Judges Ray, M.K. Thomas, and Long concurred.

The court provided no reasoning, addressed no specific legal issue, and cited no authority. The opinion states that it is not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the Escambia County circuit court’s decision.
  • The panel issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion does not identify the nature of the underlying case or the issues raised on appeal.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but supplies no written analysis of the facts or law. As a result, the opinion offers no substantive guidance beyond the outcome of this appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top