Bautista Reyes v. State — Sixth District affirms postconviction ruling without written explanation

Case
Abdias Eliud Bautista Reyes v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Nardella; Smith; Gannam
Date Decided
October 13, 2026
Docket No.
6D2026-1019
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Postconviction Relief, Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Abdias Eliud Bautista Reyes, proceeding without counsel, appealed from a ruling of the Circuit Court for Polk County in lower-tribunal case number 2021-CF-008921. Circuit Judge Cassandra L. Denmark entered the ruling under review.

The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2), which governs certain appeals from summary postconviction proceedings. The Sixth District’s opinion does not describe Reyes’s claims, the circuit court’s reasoning, or the underlying criminal case.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling. Judges Nardella, Smith, and Gannam concurred in the per curiam decision.

The court provided no written analysis or explanation for the affirmance. Accordingly, the opinion establishes only that the challenged ruling was left in place and does not announce a stated legal rationale.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in full.
  • The appeal was handled under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).
  • Because the court issued an unexplained per curiam affirmance, the opinion supplies no factual discussion or articulated rule of law.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this stage of Reyes’s appellate challenge while leaving the circuit court’s ruling intact. Its practical significance is limited by the absence of any discussion of the claims or reasons for affirmance.

For practitioners, the opinion provides a disposition but no substantive guidance concerning postconviction standards or the merits of Reyes’s arguments.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top