Beall v. State of Florida — First District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Tyler Beall v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Osterhaus, C.J.; Ray, J.; M.K. Thomas, J.
Date Decided
October 19, 2026
Docket No.
1D2026-1266
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Tyler Beall appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County, where Circuit Judge Clifton A. Drake presided.

Beall represented himself on appeal. The State was represented by Attorney General James Uthmeier and Assistant Attorney General Amanda Uwaibi. The appellate court’s opinion does not identify the underlying charges, the ruling challenged, or the arguments raised.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning. Chief Judge Osterhaus and Judges Ray and M.K. Thomas concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District left the circuit court’s decision in place.
  • The opinion provides no facts, legal analysis, or explanation for the affirmance.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Beall’s appeal in the State’s favor but supplies no written reasoning for attorneys to apply in other cases. Its practical significance is therefore primarily limited to the parties and the disposition of this appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top