Berlin v. State — affirmed the circuit court without a written explanation

Case
Aaron Berlin v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
LEWIS (Jeb Bush, 2001); Bilbrey (Rick Scott, 2014); WINOKUR (Rick Scott, 2015)
Date Decided
August 14, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-2496
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance; Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Aaron Berlin, representing himself, appealed from a ruling of the Circuit Court for Leon County. Circuit Judge Stephen Everett entered the ruling under review, and the State of Florida appeared as appellee.

The First District’s opinion does not describe the underlying charges, procedural history, issues raised, or arguments presented on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling. The court issued a per curiam affirmance consisting solely of the word “AFFIRMED.”

Because the opinion provides no reasoning, it establishes only that the challenged ruling remained in effect. It does not identify the legal grounds for affirmance or expressly decide any particular issue.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the Leon County Circuit Court’s ruling.
  • The decision was per curiam and provided no written analysis.
  • The opinion was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

The decision ends the appeal in the State’s favor unless further authorized review or rehearing changes the result. Because the court supplied no reasoning or factual discussion, the opinion offers no substantive guidance beyond its disposition of Berlin’s case.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top