Blue — affirmed the judgment without a written explanation

Case
Carlos Antonio Blue v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Traver, C.J.; Nardella, J.; White, J.
Date Decided
August 18, 2026
Docket No.
6D2024-2182
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Carlos Antonio Blue appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Orange County, where Judge Kevin B. Weiss presided. The appellate opinion identifies the lower-tribunal case as 2021-CF-015842-B-O.

The opinion does not describe the criminal charges, the proceedings below, the arguments raised on appeal, or the facts underlying the case.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment. Chief Judge Traver and Judges Nardella and White concurred in the per curiam disposition.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues presented. Accordingly, the opinion establishes only that the challenged judgment was affirmed, not the grounds on which the panel reached that result.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the Orange County circuit court’s judgment.
  • The decision was issued per curiam by a unanimous three-judge panel.
  • The opinion contains no factual discussion, legal analysis, or explanation of the basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision ends the appeal in the State’s favor unless further review or rehearing is successfully pursued. Because the court issued an unexplained per curiam affirmance, the opinion offers attorneys no substantive guidance on the legal issues that may have been raised.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top