Boldry — Florida appeals court denied prohibition relief without explanation

Case
David Glenn Boldry, Jr. v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Roberts; Long; Treadwell
Date Decided
September 4, 2026
Docket No.
1D2026-1801
Topics
Writ of Prohibition, Criminal Procedure, Original Proceedings
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

David Glenn Boldry, Jr. filed a petition for a writ of prohibition against the State of Florida in an original proceeding before Florida’s First District Court of Appeal.

The opinion does not describe the underlying case, the ruling or judicial action Boldry sought to prohibit, or the arguments presented by either party.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal denied Boldry’s petition for a writ of prohibition.

The court issued its decision per curiam and provided no reasoning, factual findings, or discussion of the legal standard governing prohibition relief. Judges Roberts, Long, and Treadwell concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The court denied the requested writ of prohibition.
  • The decision arose from an original proceeding in the appellate court.
  • The opinion offers no explanation of the underlying dispute or the basis for denial.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Boldry’s request for extraordinary relief but supplies no reasoned analysis for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases. The opinion states that it is not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top