Background
Heber Borras appealed a ruling of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, where Judge Michelle Sisco presided.
The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The opinion does not describe the underlying claims, the circuit court’s reasoning, or the relief Borras sought.
The Court’s Holding
The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
The per curiam opinion provided no analysis or explanation for the affirmance. Judges Northcutt, Sleet, and Guard concurred.
Key Takeaways
- The Second District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
- The court issued a per curiam decision without a written explanation.
- The opinion does not identify the underlying claims or establish a stated rule of law.
Why It Matters
The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but offers no reasoning for attorneys to apply in other cases. Its practical significance is therefore limited to the disposition of Borras’s appeal.
✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.