Bretz v. Sorensen — First District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Joni Z. Bretz v. William Sorensen
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Bilbrey; M.K. THOMAS (Rick Scott, 2016); Long
Date Decided
September 3, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-0917
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Joni Z. Bretz appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for Franklin County, where Judge Francis J. Allman, Jr. presided. Bretz represented herself on appeal, while William Sorensen was represented by counsel.

The First District’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, identify the order or judgment under review, state the arguments raised on appeal, or provide any additional procedural history.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam disposition. Judges Bilbrey, M.K. Thomas, and Long concurred.

The court provided no reasoning, legal analysis, or statement of the issues supporting the affirmance. The opinion therefore establishes only that the challenged circuit-court decision remained in effect.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the circuit court’s decision.
  • The disposition was per curiam and contained no explanation of the court’s reasoning.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, appellate issues, or legal rules applied.

Why It Matters

The decision ends the appeal in Sorensen’s favor unless altered through an authorized post-decision motion or further review. Because the court issued an unexplained affirmance, the opinion offers no substantive guidance on the law governing the parties’ dispute.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top