Brock v. Stonehaven at Mainstreet — Second District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Alexandria Brock v. Stonehaven at Mainstreet, LP, Watkins Realty Services, LLC, Alicia Cooper, and Erika Davenport
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
LaRose; Black; Guard
Date Decided
October 28, 2026
Docket No.
2D2026-0055
Topics
Appellate Procedure, Per Curiam Affirmance, County Court Appeal
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Alexandria Brock appealed from a decision of the County Court for Pasco County, where Judge Frank I. Grey presided. The appellate opinion does not identify the underlying claims, the county court’s ruling, or the arguments raised on appeal.

Brock represented herself. Stonehaven at Mainstreet, LP, Watkins Realty Services, LLC, Alicia Cooper, and Erika Davenport were represented by counsel.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no reasoning or legal analysis, so the opinion does not disclose the grounds for affirmance or resolve any identified legal question in a written holding.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District left the county court’s decision in place.
  • The three-judge panel issued a unanimous per curiam affirmance.
  • Because the opinion contains no explanation, it supplies no stated rationale for the result.

Why It Matters

The ruling ends this appeal with the county court’s decision undisturbed. Its practical significance is limited to that result because the appellate court did not provide facts, reasoning, or a discussion of governing law.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top